Nov 13, 2014

Reading response on "Welcome to Our Hillbrow"

Daniel Apatiga
Reading Response #11
11/13/2014

Regarding the first epigraph at the beginning of the novel, we see that Phaswane Mpe provides an analepsis and a prolepsis throughout that chapter, because we see him foretelling the story of how Refentse dies and providing the background story to Refentse’s past.  In Danticat’s essay, “Creating Dangerously,” I see a similar story developing: that of two or more characters who are going to die, as explained in prolepsis, and for similar reasons.  Like the two American rebel fighters who fought for the Haitians, Refentse fights for love and opposes death until the notion of suicide overwhelms him.  The reasons for ending his life appear to be because of failed relationships with his multiple lovers: Lerato and Refilwe.  In a lot of ways, the notion of xenophobia, which is a central theme to the novel, is similar to Danticat’s “Creating Dangerously” in that the Haitians who were in power were xenophobic to the Americans.  We know for instance that Refentse loves soccer, and we know that even though he’s dead, he  would have loved to know that “Bafana Bafana lost to France in the 1998 Soccer World Cup fiasco” (Mpe, page 1).  In the first epigraph, furthermore, the historical fact of AIDS provides the necessary background story to what’s to come in the novel, where AIDS affects Refilwe’s life detrimentally.
The second epigraph, which I presume you mean and refer to the second chapter—“Notes From Heaven”—I think most of the chapter is almost as if the narrator is talking from heaven, as Prof. Kruger wisely points out.  We see motifs of death throughout the chapter: the death of relationships between Refilwe and Refentse, Refentse mourning the fact that Lerato cheats on him with Sammy.  He’s seeing it all for what actually happened, and in that way, it is factual since I can see this happening.  However, I believe the author stylistically wrote it in a realistic way and that the notion of viewing things from heaven for what the events actually are is a stretch for me.
The characters play an observational role in that they cannot affect the lives of their loved ones on Earth, even though Refentse wants to.  In life, one can change the way things are and make things better (or worse), and in death, these abilities cease to exist; and, in heaven, one can only observe the rest of the planet and hope for the best.  Whether one believes in heaven or not, or a God, does not necessarily impact whether you will go to heaven, the novel seems to suggest.
An important sentence for me, during “Refentse’s short story,” was: “love across racial boundaries became mental instability” (Mpe, page 57).  It is a self-reflection on himself of when he wasn’t contemplating suicide, were everything to happen just right.  Nothing did turn out right though. 
It seems like gossip and rumor helped people in the end, because had people not gossiped about Sammy’s drug addiction, they would not have attempted to help him.  This was before Refentse committed suicide.  Terror was a merely what it was—a rapist—and, to me, it was a metonymy for who he was along with “child of Tiragalong,” except it was a complicating of something that was already simply, a reminder of who he was.